Skip to toolbar
Study Says Many Android Vendors Regularly 'Forget' Security Patches

If you consider your Android telephone is receiving common safety updates from the producer, you may be sadly mistaken, in response to a brand new research from a Berlin-based IT safety analysis agency.

Researchers with Security Research Labs studied Android gadgets from quite a few firms and located what they name a hidden patch hole, with massive numbers of producers often failing to replace system safety. They mentioned that failure exposes the Android ecosystem to dangers regardless of current patch enhancements, leaving gadgets inclined to distant exploits.

Google’s Android is the world’s main cell working system, with greater than 2 billion customers all over the world. It’s additionally supported by a much more numerous system of producers and builders than its rival, Apple’s iOS, which contributes to way more uneven safety practices.

Patch Claims Need ‘Independent Verification’

Researchers Karsten Noll and Jakob Lell offered their findings at this time on the HITB safety convention in Amsterdam. They mentioned they took a “novel analysis approach” to search for lacking seurity updates on a variety of Android gadgets, and found that almost all distributors “regularly forget to include some patches, leaving parts of the ecosystem exposed to the underlying risks.”

Among the businesses whose gadgets they examined, Google, Sony, Samsung, and Wiko got here out on high, with zero or only one patch usually lacking. TCL and ZTE, in contrast, landed on the underside of their record, with greater than 4 missed patches on their gadgets.

Noll and Lell’s findings contradict the claims by many Android system makers that they roll out common updates to repair vulnerabilities recognized by Google’s month-to-month Android safety bulletins. The researchers mentioned customers ought to search impartial verification that their gadgets are often patched, and developed an app referred to as SnoopSnitch for that function. SnoopSnitch is offered as a free obtain by way of the Google Play Store.

‘Defense in Depth’ Is Important

In response to Noll and Lell’s findings, Google yesterday advised Wired that a few of the telephones researchers examined may not have been Android licensed gadgets which can be required to satisfy Google safety requirements. Android product safety lead Scott Roberts additionally famous that month-to-month patches are simply one among a number of safety measures wanted to guard gadgets.

“Built-in platform protections, such as application sandboxing, and security services, such as Google Play Protect, are just as important,” Roberts mentioned.

Noll and Lell acknowledged of their research that “defense in depth” is necessary, and that “a few missing patches are usually not enough for a hacker to remotely compromise an Android device. Instead, multiple bugs need to be chained together for a successful hack.”

Android system makers started pledging to roll out month-to-month safety updates in 2016 shortly after the Stagefright vulnerability, which may allow distant exploits by hackers, was discovered to have probably affected 95 % of all Android gadgets.

“Now that monthly patches are an accepted baseline for many phones, it’s time to ask for each monthly update to cover all relevant patches,” in response to Security Research Labs. “And it’s time to start verifying vendor claims about the security of our devices.”

Image credit score: iStock/Artist’s idea.


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


©2020 KLEO Template a premium and multipurpose theme from Seventh Queen


We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.


Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?